SU PHE5001 Week 5 Discussion Latest 2019 August

PHE5001 Social and Behavioral Aspects of Public Health

Week 5 Discussion

Practice of
Public Health

By the due
date assigned, respond to the discussion question and submit your response to
the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area.

Respond to
the question by using the lessons and vocabulary found in the reading. Support
your answer with examples and research. Your response should clarify your
understanding of the topic. It should be your own, original, and free from
plagiarism. Follow the APA format for writing style, spelling and grammar, and
citation of sources.

Start
reviewing and responding to the postings of your peers as early in the week as
possible. Respond to at least two of your peers. Participate in the discussion
by analyzing each response for completeness and accuracy and by suggesting
specific additions or clarifications for improving the discussion question
response.

Task

Identify
and describe at least three different specialty areas in public health to
include the actual roles/careers, responsibilities, and organizations that
employ these positions. Explain whether you have any interest in any of these
service areas and the organizations that typically employ these positions.
Discuss what your ideal career would be like in public health.

Comment on
the postings of at least two peers.

Evaluation
Criteria

Identified
at least three different specialty areas in public health.

Described
the careers, responsibilities, and organizations associated with each area that
was identified.

Explained
the level of interest in the service areas that were presented.

Presented
information on an ideal public health career.

Justified
answers with appropriate research and reasoning by using appropriate examples
and current references from textbooks, the South University Online Library, and
other acceptable references—citing the sources in APA format.

Commented
on the postings of at least two peers by providing background to support asking
questions, providing a point of view with rationale, challenging a point of
discussion, or making a relationship between two or more points.