PHIL51 Week 6 – Fixed, high evidential standards vs. variable
PHIL 51—Scientific Reasoning
Week 6
- Fixed, high evidential standards vs. variable standards. What are they and how are they different from one another?
- The five considerations that Elabbar offers as relevant deciding whether fixed, high evidential standards or variable standard are better. What each one means, which type of evidential standard Elabbar thinks it supports, and why.
- Beneficence
- Institutional responsiveness
- Platform neutrality
- Efficiency
- Justice
- Inductive risk. What this term means and why it applies to policy assessments.
- Reliability and power. What they are and how they tradeoff against one another.
- Evidential inequality. What this term means and why it applies to climate science.
- Fundamental interests. What this term means, and an example of a fundamental interest.
- Elabbar’sjustice-based argument against fixed, high evidential standards. Be able to explain it in your own words.
- The two objections to his argument that Elabbar considers, and his responses to those objections.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on PHIL51 Week 6 – Fixed, high evidential standards vs. variable completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
