PHIL51 Week 4 – The inefficacy challenge, Be able to explain
PHIL 51—Scientific Reasoning
Week 4
- The inefficacy challenge. Be able to explain what it is and why it’s a difficult philosophicalproblem
- Be able to explain Nefsky’s dilemma for the expected utility solution to the inefficacy challenge
- Be able to discuss each of the possible responses to the dilemma that Nefsky considers, and what she has to say about each one
- The imperfect approach.
- What it is
- The support Nefsky gives for it
- How it is different from the expected utility approach
- Oppositional thinking.
- What it is
- The four causes of/problems with it that Brownstein et al. discuss
- Individualist and structuralist climate policies. Be able to explain the difference, and to give examples of each one.
- Symbiotic thinking. Be able to explain what this is, why Brownstein et al. think it is important, and give examples of it.
- Ease–impact tradeoff.
- Initiating roles and sustaining roles.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on PHIL51 Week 4 – The inefficacy challenge, Be able to explain completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
