PHIL51 Week 3 – Be able to explain why there is a debate
PHIL 51—Scientific Reasoning
Week 3
- Be able to explain why there is a debate about whether we should be telling people to try to lower their carbon footprints
- The main reasons given in Dialogues on Climate Justice for and against telling people to lower their carbon footprints
- The idea of carbon elitism. What it means and what it has to do with this debate
- The idea of a fair share. What it means and what it has to do with this debate
- The idea of a tipping point. What it means and what it has to do with this debate
- The idea of offsetting. What it means and what it has to do with this debate
- The idea of climate anarchism. What it means and what it has to do with this debate
- The idea ofanti-capitalism. What it means and what it has to do with this debate
- Joyguzzling.
- Moral requirements
- Be able to explain the following arguments against the thesis that there is no moral requirement to refrain from emitting a reasonable amount of green house gases in order to enjoy oneself AND the main criticisms that Kingston and Sinnott-Armstrong make of each argument:
- Virtue ethics.
- Group causation.
- Simple division.
- Partial causation.
- Expected disvalue.
- Fair shares.
- Politics.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on PHIL51 Week 3 – Be able to explain why there is a debate completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
