Herzing NU525 Full Course Latest 2019 March Question # 00600706 Course Code : NU525 Subject: Health Care Due on: 04/25/2019 Posted On: 04/25/2019 08:49 AM Tutorials: 1 Rating: 4.6/5

Question

Dot Image

HERZING NU 525

Unit 1 Discussion

Describe Nursing Informatics

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response
should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic
knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria
utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in
the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for
grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be
supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be
cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th
Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion
question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is
expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes
your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per
week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you
aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information
surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is
appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you
may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines
above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely
responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy
(effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Question/Prompt

In your own words, describe the role of an informatics
nurse.

Explain how an informatics nurse contributes to patient care
quality.

How the development of informatics has helped address the
concerns about patient safety raised in the “To Err Is Human” report.

Summarize how informatics has assisted in improving health
care safety in your organization and areas where growth is still needed.

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt

Read and respond to at least two other students’ postings.

Please respect the opinions of others, even if their views
differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.

Plagiarism is never acceptable – give credit when credit is
due – cite your sources.

Responses not submitted for credit are an important part of
the discussion and include postings that are 1 or 2 sentences in length, do not
demonstrate a firm understanding of the material in the text, or do not include
supporting evidence.

Unit 2 Discussion

Key Functions and Competencies

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response
should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic
knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria
utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in
the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for
grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be
supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be
cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th
Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion
question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is
expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes
your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per
week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you
aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information
surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is
appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the
literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you
may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines
above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely
responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy
(effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Question/Prompt

Identify the key functional area(s) of nursing informatics
relevant to your current position or to a position you recently held, and
briefly describe why this area(s) is relevant.

Identify the informatics competencies you selected as
essential to your functional area(s) in which you need improvement (refer to
the informatics competencies in your readings and support lesson links).

Describe why these competencies are necessary, and outline a
plan for developing these competencies.

Explain how developing nursing informatics competencies
would increase your effectiveness as a nurse.

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt

Respond to at least two other student’s postings with
substantive comments.

Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your
fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.

References and citations should conform to the APA 6th
edition.

Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if
their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.

Unit 3 Discussion

Medication Administration Workflow

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response
should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic
knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria
utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in
the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for
grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be
supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be
cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th
Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion
question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is
expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes
your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per
week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you
aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information
surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is
appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you
may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines
above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely
responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy
(effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Question/Prompt

You have been asked to conduct an analysis of the nursing
workflow for medication administration at your workplace.

Describe how and what you would do to complete this project.

What parts of the process could be supported with computers
or other technology?

How would you document and present your findings to the
facility leadership staff?

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt

Respond to at least two other student’s postings with
substantive comments.

Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your
fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.

References and citations should conform to the APA 6th
edition.

Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if
their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.

Unit 4 Discussion

Electronic Health Record Systems

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response
should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic
knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria
utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in
the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for
grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be
supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be
cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th
Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion
question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is
expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes
your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per
week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you
aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information
surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is
appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the
literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you
may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines
above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely
responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy
(effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Question/Prompt

Provide brief description of an electronic health record
system (explain the features of the system and comment on your experience in
using the system.

Do you find the system easy to use?

What features did you find useful?

What features would you like to see added?

Explain your answers and identify at least four challenges
in the implementation of electronic health records and provide an example of
each challenge.

Develop strategies for addressing each challenge based on
what has been demonstrated to be successful.

Cite your resources.

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt

Respond to at least two other student’s postings with
substantive comments.

Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your
fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.

References and citations should conform to the APA 6th
edition.

Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if
their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.

Unit 5 Discussion

Patient Health Literacy

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response
should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic
knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria
utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in
the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for
grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be
supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be
cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th
Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion
question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is
expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes
your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per
week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you
aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information
surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is
appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the
literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you
may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines
above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely
responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy
(effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Question/Prompt

Discuss the nurse’s role in improving the health literacy of
patients.

Then, identify the resource you would recommend to patients
for evaluating online health information and why it would be beneficial.

Describe additional strategies for assisting patients in
becoming informed consumers of online health information.

Explain how nurses can support patients in the use of
personal health records.

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt

Respond to at least two other student’s postings with
substantive comments.

Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your
fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.

References and citations should conform to the APA 6th
edition.

Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if
their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.

Unit 6 Discussion

Health Information Technology

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response
should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic
knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria
utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the
topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar
and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported
by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited
appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion
question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is
expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes
your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per
week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you
aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information
surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is
appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the
literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you
may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines
above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely
responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy
(effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Question/Prompt

Provide a description of a practice concern in your area of
practice.

Outline how you used or can use health information
technology to locate evidence-based practices that address this concern.

Analyze how health information technology supports
evidence-based practice.

Support with citation.

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt

Respond to at least two other student’s postings with
substantive comments.

Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your
fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.

References and citations should conform to the APA 6th
edition.

Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if
their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.

Unit 7 Discussion

Technology in Nursing Education

It is anticipated that the initial discussion response
should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic
knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria
utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in
the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for
grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be
supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be
cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th
Ed.).

Classroom Participation

Students are expected to initially address the discussion
question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is
expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes
your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per
week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you
aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information
surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is
appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the
literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric
criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If
you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you
may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines
above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely
responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy
(effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.

Discussion Question/Prompt

Simulation, HER, and virtual learning are being used as a
new tool to promote and assess student learning in nursing education.

Describe the benefits and limitations of the use of
technology in nursing education.

Can technology be used to replace clinical hours in nursing
education?

If so, are there any limitations to its use? Be specific in
your answer.

Is this allowed by your State Board of Nursing?

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt [Due Sunday]

Respond to at least two other student’s postings with
substantive comments.

Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your
fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.

References and citations should conform to the APA 6th
edition.

Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if
their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.

Unit 8 Discussion

Reflection

Please take a few moments to reflect on what you have
learned in this class, what can you take from it and apply to your practice.
Reflect on your existing practice, or your future practice. How do you plan to
apply what you’re learned into your professional work? For your convenience,
here are the course objectives:

Analyze the role of informatics and technology in nursing
practice, research, administration, and education.

Assess the impact of regulatory, privacy, ethical, and legal
issues in technology and information management.

Use information and technology to communicate, manage
knowledge, mitigate error, and support decision making as an advanced practice
nurse.

Apply knowledge of nursing informatics and technology to
develop a proposal that will improve patient safety and/or the quality of care
in a practice setting

Unit
3 Assignment

Data-to-Wisdom Continuum Analysis Paper

Instructions

The purpose of this
assignment is to be able to incorporate the data-to-wisdom continuum into the
practice of professional nurse. You are required to think of a
concept/issue/idea in your practice area then relate it to the four steps of
the data, information, knowledge, wisdom continuum. Review the file below for
details on assignment description, expectations, and grading Criteria.

Unit 5 Assignment

Consumer Health Information Website Analysis

Instructions

The purpose of this
assignment is to apply knowledge of reliable and valid information sources to
patient education in clinical nursing practice and to evaluate patient
educational materials posted on the internet.

The assignment for this
week consists of 3-5 pages paper evaluating consumer/patient health information
on the web.

You are required to find
a website that is designed to provide health information to the
consumer/patient and analyze it according to the criteria described below.

You are required to
report your analysis in a formal course paper.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Herzing NU525 Full Course Latest 2019 March Question # 00600706 Course Code : NU525 Subject: Health Care Due on: 04/25/2019 Posted On: 04/25/2019 08:49 AM Tutorials: 1 Rating: 4.6/5 completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Review the instruction
document below for details on assignment description, expectations, and grading
Criteria.

Unit 6 Assignment

Analysis of a Technology/System Application Paper

Instructions

You will be required to
conduct analysis of a technology/system application and write a formal paper.

The analysis need to be
of an application technology used in either (a) a clinical setting for managing
health data, patient care, etc or (b) educational setting for improvement of
teaching and learning of students, patients, etc.

Review the instruction
document below for details on assignment description, expectations, and grading
Criteria.

Dot Image

Order Solution Now

Similar Posts